Home > Uncategorized > Interstate rivalry and terrorism (Article)

Interstate rivalry and terrorism (Article)


Seems silly but finding that states involved in international rivalry of some sort between 1975 and 2003 were more likely to be targeted for terrorist attacks than other states. Not sure how this is linked to state sponsorship, the link that two states in conflict cause the extra attacks by active sponsorship seems difficult to prove. Assumption of state ontology permeates this study making all agency reside in states. Who is responsible? Why the state ofcourse.

Claims that previous research focused on domestic variables, macroeconomic variables, and microfoundational? variables.

It would be interesting to see if revolution or domestic unrest seems to correlate with rivalry as well. Assumption that support of terrorism is only tool in arsenal for low intensity change. Support of terrorism allows the achievement of the outcome of actual warfare (what?) without the costs. Outcomes listed are voting behaviour shifts, economic influence. Not really sure this substitutes outcome of actual warfare. “destablilization or complete destruction of rival regimes” Damn.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: